CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_

Reported by Kevin Gamiel/MCNC - CNIDR and Janet Marcisak/FTP Software

Minutes of the Networked Information Retrieval Working Group (NIR)


Agenda and Minutes

The agenda of the meeting and the minutes of the last meeting were
approved.


Reports on CNIDR and RARE-related Activities

   o Clearinghouse for Networked Information Discovery and Retrieval

     Kevin Gamiel reported that CNIDR is continuing its role of
     promoting the use and development of NIDR standards by working on
     such projects as the Global Schoolhouse, Z39.50 client, server and
     gateway software.

   o RARE

     The European Commission is currently in the process of defining a
     work program for the 12BXEU (approximately 12 billion US dollars)
     IVth Framework initiative.  One of the programs within the IVth
     Framework comprises around 50MXEU in the area of Telematics for
     Research.  RARE and its various working groups intend to develop
     and submit a large coordinated bid under this.
     A key point of the program is the transition from text-based to
     multi-media-based communication and information services.
     The RARE MMEP group, a task force of the Interactive Multi-Media
     Working Group (WG-IMM) and Information Services and User Support
     Working Group (WG-ISUS), has already generated ideas for possible
     proposals, including:

      -  Multi-media chemistry
      -  Networked CAD/CAM
      -  Dental training
      -  Multi-media conferencing for language teaching
      -  A network interactive learning resource for environmental
         design
      -  Live interactive teaching of surgery between remote centers
      -  Telepublishing


Internet-Draft:  Status Report on NIR Tools and Groups

Jill reported that the NIR report had been independently reviewed by
volunteers from around the world.  The volunteers took two or three of
the templates each, contacted each template owner and updated the
template.  They also checked for bad software and document links
referenced throughout the document.  The group agreed to the changes and
the over 200 page report has been forwarded to the area director for
submission as an RFC.


Update Schedule for Report and Parts of Report

CNIDR had offered at the last meeting to maintain the document on-line.
Jane Smith said that CNIDR would undertake this on a best-effort basis.
The InterNIC also agreed to maintain the document at their sites for
public access.  Updates for individual templates should be sent to
nir-updates@cnidr.org.


Availability of the Report in Various Formats

The intention has always been to move to having this document on-line in
HTML. There had been offers from around the world (including early
offers from CNIDR and the InterNIC) to mark up the document in HTML. It
obviously makes sense now to wait for the final RFC version before doing
this.


``April's Checklist'' on Various NIR Tools

April Marine reported on her continuing NIR checklist work.  She said
that the problem in creating such a checklist lies in the cross-platform
nature of the up-and-coming tools and the difficulty in maintaining such
a checklist.  Also, April felt that any benefits the checklist would
have offered above and beyond those of the NIR report could not justify
the expense of creating the checklist.  The group decided not to pursue
work on the checklist based on these reasons.

It was noted that the matrix of NIR tools and platforms had initially
been rather sparse (this was the original reason for wanting the
checklist) but was now pretty complete.


What Next

Jill queried the group for input on what should be the future of NIR.
She felt that, having met its chartered goals, the group should
conclude; the working group agreed.


Quality Issues

The remainder of the NIR meeting was devoted to part of a Quality BOF
chaired by Mitra.  (The other part was held during the IIIR Working
Group meeting.)

Quality issues in providing information services were discussed,
including:


   o ``Pointers to nowhere''
   o Access fails (server moved or denied access)
   o Lack of administrator information
   o Incomplete or lossy gateways
   o Inefficient gateways
   o Loss of context information (veronica/archie)
   o Poor titles
   o Misleading information (file extensions not standard types)
   o Expired information


The problem is that there are no formal procedures in place to deal with
any of these problems.

Mitra said that the brainstorming document and two documents from last
time can be obtained from ftp.path.net:/pub/ietf/Quality.

There was some discussion as to whether NIR should continue in order to
discuss quality issues.  It was agreed that this was not appropriate.
We should spawn a new group to keep all the issues together and to keep
the motivation.  Alternatively, another BOF could be held next time to
define the range of issues and possible need for several sub-groups.

This was a free ranging brainstorming session and no attempt is made to
capture that here.  Mitra will be putting together a document based on
these discussions.  Further discussion will take place on the
``quality'' mailing list, quality@sunsite.unc.edu.  To join, send mail
to listserv@sunsite.unc.edu.


Attendees

Farhad Anklesaria        fxa@boombox.micro.umn.edu
Alexis Bor               bora@ct.si.cs.boeing.com
Sepideh Boroumand        sepideh@jacks.gsfc.nasa.gov
Mic Bowman
Gregg Brekke             gbrekke@mr.net
Jodi-Ann Chu             jodi@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu
Bruce Davie              bsd@bellcore.com
Michael Elkins           elkins@areo.org
Michael Erlinger         mike@jarthur.claremont.edu
Richard Everman          reverman@ka.reg.uci.edu
Jill Foster              Jill.Foster@newcastle.ac.uk
Lois Frampton            frampton@mitre.org
Kevin Gamiel             kgamiel@cnidr.org
Arlene Getchell          getchell@es.net
Shawn Gillam             shawn@timonware.com
Anders Gillner           awg@sunet.se
Judith Grass             grass@cnri.reston.va.us
Sally Hambridge          sallyh@ludwig.intel.com
Deborah Hamilton         debbieh@internic.net
Art Harkin               ash@cup.hp.com
Alisa Hata               hata@cac.washington.edu
Roland Hedberg           Roland.Hedberg@umdac.umu.se
Jeff Hodges              hodges@jessica.stanford.edu
Richard Huber            rvh@ds.internic.net
Barbara Jennings         bjjenni@sandia.gov
Brewster Kahle           Brewster@wais.com
Padma Krishnaswamy       kri@cc.bellcore.com
John Kunze               jak@violet.berkeley.edu
Walter Lazear            lazear@gateway.mitre.org
Janet L. Marcisak        jlm@ftp.com
April Marine             april@atlas.arc.nasa.gov
Marilyn Martin           martin@netcom.ubc.ca
Ken Masica               masic@es.net
Mark McCahill            mpm@boombox.micro.umn.edu
Michael McLay            mclay@eeel.nist.gov
Mitra                    mitra@pandora.sf.ca.us
Mark Needleman           mhn@stubbs.ucop.edu
Clifford Neuman          bcn@isi.edu
Pete Percival            percival@indiana.edu
Marsha Perrott           perrott@prep.net
George Phillips          phillips@cs.ubc.ca
Thomas Powell            sestrada@aldea.com
Joyce K. Reynolds        jkrey@isi.edu
Deb Rodgers              deb@cac.washington.edu
Steven Russert           srussert@atc.boeing.com
Jane Smith               Jane.Smith@cnidr.org
Patricia Smith           psmith@merit.edu
Milan Sova               sova@feld.cvut.cz
David Staudt             dstaudt@nsf.gov
Phil Trubey              ptrubey@netcom.com
Chris Weider             clw@bunyip.com
Linda Winkler            lwinkler@anl.gov