| Internet-Draft | IETF Inclusion | August 2025 |
| ATTOUMANI MOHAMED & Ogundele | Expires 8 February 2026 | [Page] |
This document aims to foster a deeper reflection within the IETF community on inclusive participation, equitable access, and the implications of global meeting venue selections on diverse contributors. It seeks to complement existing RFCs by proposing additional dialogue, tools, and evaluation mechanisms.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 2 February 2026.¶
Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has long promoted principles of openness, inclusivity, and technical excellence. As the global Internet landscape evolves, so too must our mechanisms for ensuring equitable participation.¶
This document responds to growing calls for reflection on how the IETF addresses systemic and structural barriers that affect contributors from underrepresented regions and communities. Building on existing frameworks and policies, this draft outlines community-driven proposals to foster greater inclusion in practice.¶
In particular, it highlights three underexplored dimensions: (1) the lack of academic recognition and incentives for contributors; (2) the recurring concerns around meeting venue accessibility, safety, and equity; and (3) the need for targeted grassroots engagement — especially in Africa and other underserved regions — to build long-term pipelines for contribution.¶
Through collaborative strategies such as mentorship, multilingual onboarding, university engagement, and periodic community consultations (e.g., Africa IGF 2025), this draft invites discussion on how the IETF can better align its practices with its foundational commitments to openness and global reach.¶
This draft was inspired by feedback from various IETF participants and observations across recent meetings. It acknowledges that while RFCs 7704, 8718, and 9712 lay a strong foundation, practical issues of access, safety, and diversity persist. Community insights were also gathered during Africa IGF 2025 consultations, where similar challenges were voiced by participants across the continent.¶
This section summarizes the key community feedback received:¶
Encourage structured discussions on how the IETF selects and rotates its venues, integrating considerations of safety, inclusion, and representation, especially as conditions evolve between selection and meeting time.¶
Propose tools, scorecards, or collaborative reviews to assess venues and host countries based on inclusiveness, accessibility, and risk of exclusion.¶
Explore concrete mechanisms to host meetings in underrepresented regions (e.g., Africa), including logistical partnerships, travel funds, and hybrid session enhancements.¶
To bridge the academia-IETF divide:¶
RFCs as peer-reviewed equivalents: Advocate for tenure committees to recognize RFCs (following German academic standards valuing RFCs as 2 papers).¶
University liaison program: Create formal roles for CS departments to co-develop standards.¶
Curriculum integration: Partner with AAU to offer academic credits for IETF contributions.¶
Foster collaboration with universities, local Internet communities, and grassroots organizations to demystify IETF processes, support mentorship programs, and identify new contributors from underrepresented regions.¶
For example for African participation:¶
Consider translating key onboarding materials and IETF resources into additional languages to support broader global accessibility and comprehension. Develop metrics to track progress on inclusivity goals.¶
This document does not propose immediate policy changes but instead seeks to foster thoughtful community reflection and encourage collaborative exploration of solutions that support the IETF’s inclusivity goals.¶
Through proposals on academic recognition, grassroots engagement, venue selection dialogue, multilingual participation, and impact metrics, this draft aims to offer constructive directions grounded in community input and practical experience.¶
By broadening participation and addressing structural imbalances, the IETF can continue to evolve as a truly global, open, and equitable standards body.¶
Community feedback is warmly invited to refine, challenge, or build upon these directions.¶
The author thanks Martin Vigoureux, Peng Shuping, Michael Richardson, Laurence Lundblade, and Vint Cerf for their thoughtful feedback, which helped shape this version of the document.¶