Go to the previous, next section.
ALPHA VERSION !!!!!!!!!!!
We expect lots of changes; sadly we also expect changes which will be visible to programmers.
This document is for the Java programmer who wishes to use ILU. A programmer needs to know how ILU is mapped into Java constructs and how both Java clients and servers are generated and built. He also needs to stomach a fair load of search path, directory structure and command line lore.
The ILU runtime is in the java package xerox.ilu
. The primary interface is the class Ilu
.
A client program may access an ILU object in one of the following ways:
sbh
and class cl
of an
object,
call xerox.ilu.Ilu.objectFromSBH(sbh, cl)
which returns an instance of that class.
For example, to obtain an instance of ISL type square
from
INTERFACE shapes
whose string binding handle is sbh
,
one would call xerox.ilu.Ilu.objectFromSBH(sbh, shapes.square)
.
(sid, ih)
and class cl
of an object that
has been published using the simple binding service,
call xerox.ilu.IluSimpleBinding.lookup(sid, ih, cl)
which returns an instance of that class
(or raises an excepotion if the lookup fails).
INOUT
or OUT
parameter.
Record types could be subclassed and the Java class of the subclass assigned registered with the stub for the record. Whenever ILU needs to allocate an instance of such a record it will allocate a an instance of the subclass instead.
A Java program(er) which wants to implement a object type T from interface I
needs to create a class which implements the stubber-generated Java interface I
. Objects of this class then are registered with the ILU runtime either implicitly or explicitly, or with an Object Table.
Explicit registration allows specification of additional parameters, like the string binding handle, the server used and more. Explicit registration done by calling the stubber generated method I.T_stub.registerTrueObject
. As an alternative, if the programmer is willing to specify the class, he can also use the method xerox.ilu.Ilu.registerTrueObject directly.
Objects are implicitly registered with ILU if they are returned as a result value from a method call that returns an object type or has an object type as an INOUT or OUT parameter or if they are published using the Simple binding mechanism
1) The ILU type must be unique. If no type is given ILU will look at the Java type and make its best possible guess about the ILU type.
2) The ILU type must be loaded. Unless the ILU type is loaded the guesser will never find that type. If there is any doubt about whether a stub implementing an ILU type is loaded or not, it might be useful to actually load the class. The xerox.basics.Environment class can be used to load a class from external commands.
IluServer
which is
implemented by the xerox.ilu.IluServer
class.
An IluServer
can be created by calling the function
ilu.createServer([serverID])
,
which returns a value of type IluServer
.
If serverID is a string, it specifies the server ID;
if it is None
, one will be invented automatically.
Other methods allow the specification of a daemon flags or ports for different transports or protocols, or an object table.
An objectTable allows specification of a callback function for creating true instances on demand.
The first time a true server is created, it becomes the default server. The default server is used for an exported object if a server is not otherwise specified or when it is explicitly requested with the defaultServer method. If an object is exported before any servers have been created, one will be created automatically using default parameters and possibly a message to that effect will be written to System.err.
An object of type IluServer
has an accessor method serverId()
that returns
its server ID.
The first time you see any of these tree structures you are bound to be overwhelmed. However, it is not that bad if you know some of the reasoning. If you have a good understanding of the java system building concepts without ILU, this might be easy to follow.
Sad to say, Sun's documentation is not conceptionally clean. The functionality is different when directories are specified as command line options or with environment variables.
1) Java sources can be thought of as tree structured in the package domain. You may or may not assume that sources are stored in a similar directory nesting as the package nesting. This is not an important issue because the Java compiler lets users specify source files explicitly. (Unless you are working with very explicitly make files, I recommend compiling multiple sources with one single compile command and let the java compiler worry about dependencies)
2) Precompiled binaries can be found using the classpath command line switch or the CLASSPATH environment variable. The semantics is different! The classpath command line switch must be complete (including system binaries). If the CLASSPATH environment variable is used the standard binaries are automatically accessed. You can work either way, if you know the difference.
3) The most important monkey wrench to know about is #3; where are compiled binaries stored. The -d option allows to specify a directory. Absence of the -d option takes the working directory. HOWEVER: With the -d option binaries are stored hierarchically in the destination directory, according to their package structure. Without the -d option binaries are stored directly in the curent working directory. RECOMMENDATION: Always use the -d option. If the -d option is not used some Java tools will not find the binaries... Don't get confused that "Hello World" programs can be compiled without -d option.
4) The compiler itself loads binaries from the CLASSPATH environment variable. Be warned, that is the same environment variable as used in 2)
To make matters worse
Stubbing will create a very large number of files with the Java extension. You don't want to loose your source files among the generated stubs.
Solution
We recommend creating a subdirectory called "./javastubs". All generated stubs should be generated into this directory. (This is the default; Use -dir option to change)
Stubs might have conflicting names
Solution
Generated stubs in a hierarchical directory structure, according to their Java package structure. (This is the default; Use -flat option to change)
Note
(As a safety measure) the stubber does NOT create this directory automatically.
Stubs might conflict with manually generated Java sources.
Solution 1
Use good ILU interface names (Or IDL module names)
Solution 2
Direct the stubber to generate all stubs into a prefix package stubs. (The stubber does 2) for default, but we do consider the solution 1) to be good for carefully written stubs.; Use -prefix or -noprefix option to change the stubber behavior)
Note
Unlike the top level stub directory, sub directories are created automatically by the stubber.
1) Is normal... use the CLASSPATH environment variable.
2) There is nothing special here. Compile the stubs into whatever directory you want (e.g.) "./classes" and put that directory on the CLASSPATH environment variable.
3) The classes binaries from the ILU runtime support are compiled into a directory .../javaclasses. The reason for this non-standard place is the fact that some ILU developers believe the subdirectory ./classes should be reserved for some other purpose.
4) The C binaries (object files) are accessed using the LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The path must have an entry pointing into the ILU java runtime directory.
Java Ilu listens to a large number of java command line switches to your application. The simplest one is to set the -D command line option -Dilu.debug.default=4 .
Note that the -D option of the java interpreter has no relationship whatsoever to the -d option of the java compiler.
Hint when using dbx or gdb The standard java binaries (classes) are found automaticly (without specification on the CLASSPATH environment variable) when not debugging. When debugging, those classes MUST be specified on the CLASSPATH... Don't ask me why.
An application programmer will face the decision whether the implementation for true object should be in the package designated for stubs, or in a package of its own. Both choices do make sense; ILU will work either way and doesn't make that decision for you. In general we expect most applications to prefer working in one single package. However we can imagine scenarios where for security reasons a stub could be trusted but a server object might not be trusted, or they'd be signed independently by different entities.
But PLEASE: Don't ever write java code which is not in a package at all. You will end up putting it in a package later anyway. It will be much more work later then at the beginning to set up all your commands and files to work with a package.
java-stubber
.
The stubber reacts to some command line options. All command line options (except if documented specifically) have a second variant with a suffix "1". If the command line option with suffix is used, an extra argument for the name of an interface is read. The suffixed command line options are valid for the particular named interface; the un-suffixed command line options are valid for all interfaces. (Suffixed command line options override un-suffixed command line options. Option processing is from left to right.)
Since the stubber creates a surprisingly large number of java files, these files must be directed to a designated stub directory.
xerox.ilu.IluSimpleBinding.publish()
.
An object may be unpublished by calling the method xerox.ilu.IluSimpleBinding.withdraw()
.
A published ILU object may be obtained by calling
xerox.ilu.IluSimpleBinding.lookup(sid, ih, cl)
,
where sid
is object's server's server ID, ih
is the object's instance handle, and cl
is its class.
Go to the previous, next section.